/ashleyj/ - Ashley Jones

>>29297
His dick slipped on the keyboard

>>29297
>>29321
I scrolled to the bottom of the Catalog and found these old threads. God, I missed the good old days.

>>29324
I miss when Ashley was hot too but she's not underage anymore. She's 15 going on 30. This Friday ain't feeling so freaky anymore.

>>29344
it's Thursday

>>29345
She doesn't have much time left.

00053-721303615.png
[Hide] (392.2KB, 512x512)

>>9987
>I appreciate your optimism, I really do
It isn't just something theoretical for me. I feel it. I don't know when the last time was that you wanted to try and chase art, to create, and feel there was an idea you wanted to capture and bring into the world, and feel driven to make. 

I feel it. It is like becoming awake.

Ai art isnt art its more like engineering, 
Like you guiding a machine with prompts to get it churn out a response to your liking. Though its certainly capable of some impress results visually, it ultimately lacks "soul".

There is also the more sinister element of Ai.
People are already gullible from just reading a headline. Now that we have rapidly improving tech to produce realistic deepfakes, the potential to cause more social divide and make people believe anything is only going to get worse.
I understand there is apparently software to detect if something was Ai generated, hopefully that can keep up with the pace that Ai is developing.
Even if it does though, will people believe if something was declared deepfaked anyways? The line between knowing whats real and what isnt is going to get blurrier and blurrier and with todays social and political climate, I think it spells nothing but bad news ahead.

>>10057
>I understand there is apparently software to detect if something was Ai generated
There is, but it's 100% garbage across the board, and I suspect it will be almost impossible to ever tell whether something is AI generated with complete certainty. This is true for both pictures and text. I've tried them myself, the results are borderline random.
When GPT was first in the headlines a bunch of boomer professors scrambled to find "AI detection" tools and shitloads of college age kids who had legitimately written their papers flocked to the internet saying how they got into trouble, were getting flunked from their classes, etc. (They couldn't ALL have been lying and at a cursory glance I found dozens of reports like this).

>Even if it does though, will people believe if something was declared deepfaked anyways? The line between knowing whats real and what isnt is going to get blurrier and blurrier and with todays social and political climate, I think it spells nothing but bad news ahead.
I hate to say it but I agree

>>10059
yeah thats what i feared. The ability to easily fake stuff exponentially outpaces the ability to disprove it.
Even if you can prove a AI video.audio deepfake is real or fake, people are already fucking stupid RE: Covid conspiracies but we will very soon have the ability to create super believable bullshit via artificial intelligence???? RIP

f5b9ba594c2f7a4c8618cecfe81c0202082b16e548dc4286765449f11b920873.jpeg
[Hide] (125.9KB, 687x968)

>>9396 (OP) 
breasts

>>28335
kek holy shit please share more of this ashley, not the horse cock

0a06f57e9de1e678e5065f6a344f1f8bd81e512c51d011b238cf72a280f5e4e4.png
[Hide] (16.6KB, 466x190)

okay I made a new one

>>29002
Beautiful shart (she-art)

>>29002
9.8/10 
not only did you capture her hairstyle and the gap between her eyes, you even got her (slightly) lazy eye!

>>29002
That's the cool one.

e147188cbe23bfcfbda3fbad0f1c04f8ffed30eed5e843746861c402303c6fca.mp4
[Hide] (7.8MB, 576x1024, 00:58)

>>20776
Doom

>>29119
>man hand
>painted nails

>>29121
>play Doom
>get man hand

>>29124
Ashley plays Doom. Are you saying she has man hands?

blown_tranny.jpg
[Hide] (204KB, 699x871)

It is a man. Ashley is going to have to move these posts to the tranny thread now.
https://www.instagram.com/pc_user_486/
https://www.instagram.com/Lea_M_star/

75987629859625.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 876x1315)

Weekly World News is the only paper that keeps me informed.

>>29100
nice. i love conspiracy theories, false flags and psyop. moar pls.

1724430983958144.jpg
[Hide] (89KB, 828x781)

    >A Florida man is facing 20 counts of obscenity for allegedly creating and distributing AI-generated child pornography, highlighting the danger and ubiquity of generative AI being used for nefarious reasons.
    >The investigation kicked off after Indian River County Sheriff's Office received tips that McCorkle was prompting an AI image generator to make child sexual imagery and distributing it via the social media app Kik.
    >McCorkle’s arrest was part of a county operation taking down people possessing child pornography, but the generative AI wrinkle in this particular arrest shows how technology is generating new avenues for crime and child abuse.
    >The increasing tide of generated AI child sexual abuse imagery has prompted federal, state and local lawmakers to push legislation to make this type of porn illegal.
    >Last year, the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children received 4,700 reports of generated AI child porn, with some criminals even using generative AI to make deepfakes of real children to extort them.
https://futurism.com/the-byte/man-arrested-csam-ai

>>29122
If no real children is involved, then what is the problem?

>>29123
They claim that anyone in possession of such imagery will commit a sexual crime against a minor in the future, basically the guns kill people argument or the central plot of Minority Report.

421368981_7892995260717759_1810525422601654310_n.jpg
[Hide] (28.8KB, 720x399)

>>29065
Is that supposed to mean something to me, retard? I know your mom pretty well. She failed as a parent.

>>29066
Hey are you the guy that always finds a way to talk about people's moms? What's your deal?

>>29067
The deal is a quarter back refund but your mom thinks I'm talking about football.

The bwc perfection society indulges in the respect for the best perfection bwc the world for the bwc 7 inches closer to god deserve womenal biological sex preganancies the frequency resonance of white skin heals burn victims from rape the bwc perfection

weight lift

>>29078
English, motherfucker, do you speak it?

>>28688
A new Ashley video soon? Yay!

28750 get

>>28750
hell yeah!

>>28750
waht

>>28754
What?

>>22675
>autistic people like ashley
Sorry just to be clear I meant NON-autistic people UNlike ashley

>>22671
>Just curious -- are you using a physical phone or using a headset?
Headset for now, but I have plans to go through with your physical phone tutorial in the future. I'm excited to choose my own novelty phone.

This might be a dumb question or need more context, but how do I actually make a call without a physical phone using Gajim?

07c107eba31ebf729360ace5f9cfd35fee54929d99d11fb80dcea6cb68da1e38.jpg
[Hide] (22.3KB, 951x407)

>>23963
https://jmp.chat/faq
See Q3 and Q4. You have to add the phone number you want to call as a contact. When adding them as a contact, add the phone number and "@cheogram.com" at the end, such as "+14169938000@cheogram.com". (Make sure to include the country code +1 or whatever their country code is). Now they will appear in your contacts list. Go back to your messages. Press the blue plus icon and select "start chat". Find the contact you added and double click to have them appear in your message list. This won't actually send a message. Then click the icon (picrel) and select start voice chat. I assume this will work with a headset if it's configured with Gajim in the preferences. Try test calling major stores so you won't feel shame trying to call someone important in case it messes up.

FYI you might want to adjust your privacy settings before adding contacts. Click on your icon, then select the wrench icon that says "Account settings", then select the privacy section. By default it does things such as share if you received/read a message among more, which is unnecessary.

Sorry, I am clueless about JMP and Jabber, but after playing around with the Cheogram bot, it seems that the JID associated with Ashley's phone number is different from the one that she uses for Jabber chat. Has she made the latter one public, and can we call her via Jingle?

>>28440
>it seems that the JID associated with Ashley's phone number is different from the one that she uses for Jabber chat.
I don't know what you mean. I have one XMPP address that I use with JMP chat, which is required in order to use JMP chat, and I only have one phone number. If you add a contact using "@cheogram" (see >>23967), you can call as a contact. However, a call using my XMPP address will definitely not get answered because I never have a headset attached to my computer (nor configured with Gajim) and I rarely ever have Gajim open, so I wouldn't see it anyway. Calling my Garfield phone is how to talk to me in real time. I check my emails regularly also.

>>28373
Wow that looks EXACTLY like Ashley!

>>28373
>blonde giantess ashley
would

2cb065850d0231004b7dedd9d1de0354628e3b361df2ca57589ae1e6f3efe161.webm
[Hide] (3.6MB, 720x1280, 00:12)

>>28034
at first when I saw that i was like nah, not really. but then I saw this posted somewhere else and thought that in this one she looks like a much older Ashley. 
Especially the mannerisms

>>27845
No I'm pretty sure it's scientifically proven without a shadow of a doubt that Ashley Jones is indeed not perfectly normal.
>>27839
>we watched it before one of her video premiers over on cytube
Ah, I see. Makes sense that someone would have brought it up in the last few years.

cceb7cb56651415c50d1d34c253349069214308a33a4ed45a45cec632ccc6993.mp4
[Hide] (523.3KB, 864x480, 00:07)

It was such a goof film, the sequel sucked balls

Kalifornia.bmp
[Hide] (1012.6KB, 720x480)

Kalifornia.mp4
[Hide] (75.6KB, 368x240, 00:03)

Kalifornia (1993), it stars Brad Pitt and Juliette Lewis(nice tits).

c355571577c1ec37a902b09a2d3d032f.jpeg
[Hide] (3.5KB, 55x55)

>>28399
Yea, Juliette Lewis was always a cutie. I liked her in From Dusk 'Till Dawn. That dance that Salma Hayek did in From Dusk 'Till Dawn was kinda earth shaking.

>>28400
Salma Hayek. Yes. Juliette Lewis. No.