>>37803
It's not necessarily the porn itself that I dislike, AI porn is simply the thing that is most posted of me, and therefore what I talked about. Though, I think certified gooners are too worldly and will be trapped to reincarnate because they cannot separate themselves from carnal traps such as sex, food, possessions, etc.
I feel that this the following point goes unheard, and it's more believable to think that I am offended due to the sexual aspect of it, which is untrue. I have sexual AI of me and Duke Nukem on my website, naked look-alikes of me on my website, and I had asked for cum tributes for my movie, so the sexual aspect does not bother me.
Here is a copy paste of what does bother me regarding AI, which is why I complained about AI:
>If you want the internet to be a normie-tier "social media IS GOOD" AI goyslop infused bubble, then the entire rest of the internet is that. This is the one place I'm trying to keep, that is not that. It isn't about the porn, it's about corporate data-mining AI itself being entirely retarded and used by low IQ faggots who are typically incapable of naturally creating anything. If people want to post AI, then it must be locally created with mentions of the checkpoint, loras, basemodels, positive and negative prompt, etc. But the low IQ AI faggots like you that lurk on this board have no idea what I'm talking about with this.
I mys
Last edited by admin