>>31638
I appreciate your willingness to improve. I mean this with the utmost respect, but I would probably rate your bait at around a 3. I'm sorry if that seems unfairly low at first glance, but I can explain my logic using some of your more recent posts from this evening.
In >>31632 you said:
>You must be delusional on top of how retarded you are.
I feel like this line is very generic. WHY are they delusional? WHY are they retarded? Possible answers might be that they're delusional to think that even a hairy midget like Ashley would entertain them as romantic prospects, or that they're retarded because even a female spic with no higher education is smarter than them. And so on. Ironically, to troll people interested in a particular topic/person, you have to become interested in that topic yourself, because you can more easily find the real gut-punchers if you're familiar with the lore.
In >>31633 you said:
>"Yummy. Finger-lickin' good"
Use greentext when you quote someone on an image board. If you don't, you'll look retarded to the losers that have spent the last 15+ years doing this.
>You don't want your little penis to be buried by layers of fat.
I mean, this isn't a bad line really, I appreciate that it's unique. But I think your'e doubling down too much on the penis rhetoric, as you continue with:
>What will Ashley think when you can't wank your micropenis to her hairy legged and hairy armpitted self. HAHAHA
Some people here undoubtedly have small penises, but when you're going too hard with "micropenis," because it's a pretty funny word (not to mention a serious and rare medical condition which anyone here is actually likely to have). You might even be making the guys with 4-inchers feel better, because "at least it's not a micropenis." But here's the most important thing to understand, and the biggest flaw in your baiting: by attacking Ashley (essentially saying things like she's not pretty, or her body hair is gross, etc), you're actually going to make a significant percentage of the board population feel BETTER (except for perhaps Ashley herself). Here's why: by insulting her and pointing out physical flaws, you're making the guys here:
1. Believe she's more attainable than she actually is (i.e., not at all)
2. Enjoy the false belief that maybe they have a shot if other guys aren't interested in her
3. Giving them the opportunity to "white knight" in her defense and feel like they're protecting their waifu (and thus are owed future good boy points)
It's much, much more effective to hit them where it hurts and continually remind them that Ashley will never be their girlfriend. Ironically, posting simp material like the aforementioned "feels" videos will hurt them the most. It's counterintuitive, but building ashley up into an unobtainable goddess figure (even though she isn't) will actually hurt them the most. You can also go the route of starting a depression/"black pill" type thread, where you point out that Ashley has probably had a male who is NOT the reader have an orgasm into her mouth, pussy, or asshole, which -- let's be real here -- is probably true.
In any event, you also went on to say,
>Seriously, you fags simp for nastiest and most repulsive women to ever grace the Internet.
This is just objectively not true. I'm not arguing the point; I'm just saying why it's not great troll material. You come off as butthurt and maybe even as experiencing "sour grapes." Ashley might not be your type, but most heterosexual men would agree that she's very cute. Now, if you had posted this in a Bonbi thread or something, you might have a point.
Anyway, I hope this commentary/analysis helps you do better with your trolling next time. Hell, you might even get a rise out of me! Have fun and good night.